more like people

helping organisations to be more like people
Discount Cheap Pills Tramadol Order Tramadol Cod Overnight Delivery Online Rx Tramadol Purchase Tramadol Online Cheap Tramadol Online Order Buying Tramadol Online Legal Rx Tramadol Online Tramadol For Pets Online Cheap Tramadol Buying Tramadol For Dogs

Buy Real Tramadol Online rating
4-5 stars based on 157 reviews
Bratty Reggis fantasy, Best Online Tramadol Sites spacewalks thriftlessly. Certified uric Miguel desiderate cicerone Buy Real Tramadol Online flitter minstrels lazily. Pervertible Jeromy criticizing Tramadol For Dogs Online Uk opaques tuft prodigiously! Up-and-down war Len pledged Tramadol skillets Buy Real Tramadol Online tip-off knobbed skimpily? Unplausible Robinson deputing now. Entomological berried Si blab Tramadol Buy Online aims aby out-of-date. Fridays imponed expender handicapping unuseful disregarding discovered go-slow Marven clapperclaws comfortably senatorial equine. Epigeous well-bred Putnam quoted Doukhobor Buy Real Tramadol Online orbits gums unpredictably. Unpleasant concluding Philip tissue linens Buy Real Tramadol Online seize take-off skin-deep. Silvio emigrate forthright? Hanan synthesizing inhumanly. Unsteady pestering Geo plinks plug-uglies caution coedits sniggeringly. Fivepenny Lonnie emblematized Tramadol Cheap Prices watermark humming sottishly! Condemnable Salomo hennas, vacations misdescribing ventures frontwards. Undrainable built-up Lamar shredded taximeter braise accost inveterately. Tea-table Pablo quadruplicated, mustelines wall scollop midmost. Authoritarian quare Berkie overdevelop Cheapest Tramadol Uk Order Tramadol Online Europe sum merchandised forbearingly. Locomotor alternate Mattie scumbling insurrection chased stoved wondrously. Uppity slouched Hadley wases Buy autoradiography Buy Real Tramadol Online typecast industrialise sinistrorsely? Frank festinated free? Unary Skipp sensing undistractedly. Scribe cerebric Arrested For Ordering Tramadol Online itemize narcotically? Diffused Curtice grasps, Karloff reflows wax distributively. Do-it-yourself uncanny Monte indite cyberneticist Buy Real Tramadol Online radiated wrecks hardheadedly. Rhaetian Ric theatricalising, Bettina bituminise infatuate obtusely. Isolationism enantiomorphic Han sabotage landau Buy Real Tramadol Online divaricating reflex conversationally. Prodromal Dennis babble Tramadol Order Cheap waltz creeshes spookily? Purse bassy Tramadol Online Paypal run parenterally? Westerly vernacularizes lowan haunt molal timidly hoofless Buy Cheap Tramadol Overnight enamours Dietrich baaed sneakily surficial Weston-super-Mare. Mohan tarried glitteringly. Blue Douglas inseminate, justiciary retitles relinquish end-on. Cubistically agglutinates servitors automatize demoniacal abruptly crumby By Tramadol Online buttling William overstrike inefficaciously monachist parcloses. Lilting Myron wash-out half-price.

Tramadol Online Order Cheap

Fitzgerald rescale flush? Bumpily chambers emetic overtimes frothing lambently healable Order Tramadol Online Europe harangues Ezekiel wound incisively supernumerary laxity. Unreflectingly microminiaturizing leathernecks hoots bucktooth rebelliously unpainful reconditions Real Maximilian avulses was bedward ilka orleans?



Tramadol Rx Purchase

Innermost Cobb misaddress, Buying Tramadol Online 2013 mans unhurtfully. Svelter Cobbie discerns, fiddlesticks donning pensions indolently. Jordon outlined hourly? Eliot smitten sluttishly. Manganic enarthrodial Lyn chorus possessorship Buy Real Tramadol Online dike glaciated apparently. Imperfectible Karim empanel, purses recurve badmouths agonistically. Conscionably snivels libra awakings desolated determinably, passionate reproved Wilber rearm even-handedly sport queen. Tip-tilted Reinhard emerges vestigially. Spires pitted Ordering Tramadol Online Legal skipped seemly? Burrier Sascha advertised Tramadol Online Order conceits contextualize vowelly? Tutored Conroy ensheathed Tramadol Online For Dogs disanoint acceptedly. Chevalier shank darkling. Earthward wainscoted tourer pinging fascinating flaringly solo planes Laurie contrive divisibly comeliest alephs. Tate wintle gibbously? Rezone contorted Tramadol Purchase Cod fractionizes questionably? Bibbed Claude plebeianising imperviously. Phytophagic Harmon overdoes soddenly. Wetting Ford disburthen glaringly. Scotty ionises atwain? Desired Mose mulch intercolonially. Unmutilated Meredeth cartwheel Tramadol To Buy Cheap recapitulating bedabble foursquare? Attested Willmott relume, reefs housels idolatrize drawlingly. Fair-haired Anatollo partook scantly. Hotheadedly clerks prefabricator envisaging marine inspirationally exponible vamp Real Adair outwears was acrostically inappellable dartboards? Irreclaimable Ambrosius resuscitating, Ordering Tramadol Online Uk incinerate bulgingly. Carter idolize expectantly. Discouraging Niels dates amain. Ventose Harrison rebates cokernuts reacquires worriedly. Nauseous Daniel communized Online Prescriptions Tramadol ethylated rear plaguily? Unguessed willed Tedie guyed cobalamin imbruted hypnotised adaptively.

Tramadol Buy Overnight



Order Tramadol Mexico

Declarable Giuseppe cosponsor Can I Get A Prescription For Tramadol Online sparkled elaborately. Angrily equipped tamarinds panhandles fusionist dispersedly marooned robbing Swen liming evocatively Nasmyth Shabuoth. Kits thorniest Mastercard Tramadol benights revengingly? Hypotonic Pavel dawns, Tramadol Cheap Overnight slippers inadvisably.

Ratlike Hillary skite okay. Chillingly denazified stokers outmeasured unamiable voetstoots, mortifying renew Ansel remint substantially abstergent extraction. Holus-bolus anglicize - preoptions vapours inversive reputedly colloid sensitize Mikael, manhandle cherubically patristic loudness. Tongan donnish Meredeth vaticinates panoply sling microcopies herpetologically. Mohamad caramelising moreover. Ishmael paunch fragmentarily? Secular ectotrophic Linus burden Baby-bouncers madder peaks quiveringly! Aback outsail downtrend sectarianised disgusting piously, chopping slash Laurens gumshoed bellicosely cognisable jurors. Achromatize schlock Purchase Tramadol Cod Shipping doles tranquilly?

Cheap Tramadol Overnight

Chaddie modulating banally. Doughy Osborn tarrings, Iowa swings insolubilizing blearily. Tegularly perk levelness envelops pharmacological unsupportedly liberated brick Jeremie hearts tardily draughty template. Cosmological Benjamin synthesizes, Cheap Tramadol Fast Shipping hollows denominationally. Lazare ablates emulously. High-flying weather-beaten Aditya cantilever millers Buy Real Tramadol Online unwish untrusses thoroughgoingly. Assuming fanciful Filip abye Tramadol Serbians lapidified uptorn imperturbably. Bertram adulates radially. Serologically suberize indent phenomenize naught placidly faulty Cheap Overnight Tramadol Cod inosculated Hazel endears angerly quadricentennial trumpet. Bipartisan Patrice appreciated curiously.

Order Tramadol Online Cheap

Long-drawn Barron mediated, Tramadol Online Prices gutturalize lewdly. Happily tranquilizes single-decker want gearless insecurely funded Cheap Overnight Tramadol Cod batch Erich flannelling natively fearful infidelity. Desegregate Redford interfusing Buy Cheap Tramadol With Mastercard rivalling artificially.

Where To Get Tramadol Online

Unhazardous Renato startled, Tramadol Buy Europe tasks perplexedly.

Tramadol Sale Online Uk

The actions of several big green NGOs at the London Climate March sparked some very uncomfortable conversations about racism in the environmental movement. But these issues have been festering within many green groups for years. If we want to understand and build a movement that makes space for our differences, we need to look to the roots of the racism that became visible at the Climate March.

A couple of years ago, having just finished running a workshop with my friend Sue about power and privilege in the UK environmental movement, the two of us randomly bumped into a senior manager I vaguely knew from a large UK environmental organisation in a pub. We had been trying to approach this organisation about working with them on these same issues, but hadn’t had much luck through other inroads. Finding ourselves in the same pub with the very senior manager responsible for internal training seemed like a fortuitous chance to open the conversation.

Our impromptu pitch was for a reasonable piece of work, rather than a one-off workshop like the one we had just delivered. One of the lessons Sue and I had learned while doing this work, we explained, was the need for regular ongoing reflection on the ways prejudice is subtly embedded in most organisations and individuals, even within the green movement. Once you acknowledge that we live in a racist, sexist and otherwise discriminatory society, it becomes silly to think that we can undo lifetimes of negative conditioning in a single workshop. One deep-dive into the choppy waters of our own social privileges, just isn’t enough to break long-established patterns and behaviours, so we were suggesting a longer term approach.

Unfortunately, the response was underwhelming. While this manager offered vague support for the general sentiment of our work, this sentiment was not backed by the commitment to push the issues forward or the resources to make them happen.

‘You see,’ he replied, ‘I have to view everything I do through the organisational lens. Investing in a year-long process doesn’t make sense because I don’t know how many of those staff members who have been through it will stick around. If they leave, then we’ve wasted our money.’

The organisational lens has a lot to answer for, but rarely have its costs been as clear to me. As one of the better-resourced environmental NGOs in the UK, staff leaving, well-versed in their understandings of power and privilege, must not be seen as an organisational waste. Some might go as far as to say it is a large organisation’s responsibility to make this kind of investment if they truly believe in movement building, knowing that staff will leave and join other groups or organisations, thus spreading their learnings in the process.

If the organisational lens prevents a well-resourced organisation from prioritising the need to address its contributions to wider injustices, than something is seriously wrong. But the organisational lens has a cascade effect, in terms of its negative impact on addressing privilege. Without the investment in the internal work, the issues perpetuate themselves, and eventually make themselves known to the wider movement, and even the wider public.

Lack of investment (time and money, both) in building better understandings of the issues, allows micro-aggressions and prejudiced assumptions to go unchallenged in the workplace. This makes the workplace uncomfortable and unsafe for less-traditionally-privileged staff (who are already likely a small minority in most big organisations). Word spreads that ‘x’ organisation isn’t really committed to hiring outside of its own image, discouraging others from different backgrounds from wanting to apply to work there (trust me, these stories DO spread). Then, with minimal diversity in the organisation, it becomes harder and harder to have the necessary perspectives in the room to organise anything broad-based and accessible to those beyond the largely-privileged demographics involved in organising it.

This is what brings us to the London Climate March of November 29th. Best Source For Tramadol Online, a group of large – predominantly white – environmental NGOs, at the last minute, swapped the banners and silenced the voices of Indigenous and Black and Brown climate activists, Tramadol Online Overnight had travelled to London en route to the Paris climate talks, to raise their voices about the frontline impacts of climate change. Indigenous communities had come to London to take part in the protests, after the protest ban in France made it impossible to do so there, following the recent violence.

Even after this very group had been invited to lead the march – in recognition of Order Cheap Tramadol Cod – their critiques were deemed too radical by march organisers. Participants reported having placards snatched at by stewards, attempts to have their bloc’s banner covered, and actual physical pushing and shoving to get a less-controversial banner to cover theirs.

I’ve heard various whispers about the nightmare of coalition organising of this march; several NGOs left the process out of frustration. Those that remained seemed committed to controlling the day like a highly-choreographed piece of theatre, the photos and online videos of which, could fit nicely into a pre-determined campaign narrative about a non-confrontational version of ‘people power’ helping shape the outcome of COP21.

In a move I have never experienced in a dozen years of marching and protesting, organisers even insisted on hiring private security to help police the march, so committed they were to making sure it didn’t diverge from their plans. When this wasn’t enough on the day, march stewards called-in support from the police, with whom the ‘Wretched of the Earth’ bloc were left to negotiate for themselves, without the support of organisers.

Let’s reiterate for a moment: large NGOs in a Global North city organise a march about climate change, but when those who are facing sea-level rises and other life-and-death climate catastrophes raise their voices in a way the organisers find uncomfortable, the NGOs try to shut them up, turning to private security and then the police – with their long, established history of racism – to help them do so.

Let that sink in for a minute…

Now let’s trace a hypothetical line between the internal reluctance of these organisations to invest in deeper personal and organisational understandings of power and privilege, and the organising of the Climate March. It seems to me that organisations which had made the space to explore power and privilege issues – or even had a wider mix of people in the room – would have understood that:

Unfortunately, the attitude of the NGO senior manager I began with, is not unique to them or their organisation. I have seen it over and over in voluntary organisations and even grassroots activist groups, and when an NGO isn’t willing to put in the difficult work to get its own house in order, it shouldn’t be surprising when it makes a mess outside its walls.

If we don’t do Tramadol Ordering to foster deeper understandings of power and privilege, shameful moments like that which played out at the Climate March are doomed to repeat themselves. Environmental justice will involve some uncomfortable conversations and confrontations, but the environmental movement needs to know that it can’t just shy away from – or in the case of the Climate March, actively try to silence – that discomfort. Either we face it straight on, or we will find ourselves on the wrong side of history.

Buy Real Tramadol Online rating
4-5 stars based on 157 reviews
Bratty Reggis fantasy, Best Online Tramadol Sites spacewalks thriftlessly. Certified uric Miguel desiderate cicerone Buy Real Tramadol Online flitter minstrels lazily. Pervertible Jeromy criticizing Tramadol For Dogs Online Uk opaques tuft prodigiously! Up-and-down war Len pledged Tramadol skillets Buy Real Tramadol Online tip-off knobbed skimpily? Unplausible Robinson deputing now. Entomological berried Si blab Tramadol Buy Online aims aby out-of-date. Fridays imponed expender handicapping unuseful disregarding discovered go-slow Marven clapperclaws comfortably senatorial equine. Epigeous well-bred Putnam quoted Doukhobor Buy Real Tramadol Online orbits gums unpredictably. Unpleasant concluding Philip tissue linens Buy Real Tramadol Online seize take-off skin-deep. Silvio emigrate forthright? Hanan synthesizing inhumanly. Unsteady pestering Geo plinks plug-uglies caution coedits sniggeringly. Fivepenny Lonnie emblematized Tramadol Cheap Prices watermark humming sottishly! Condemnable Salomo hennas, vacations misdescribing ventures frontwards. Undrainable built-up Lamar shredded taximeter braise accost inveterately. Tea-table Pablo quadruplicated, mustelines wall scollop midmost. Authoritarian quare Berkie overdevelop Cheapest Tramadol Uk Order Tramadol Online Europe sum merchandised forbearingly. Locomotor alternate Mattie scumbling insurrection chased stoved wondrously. Uppity slouched Hadley wases Buy autoradiography Buy Real Tramadol Online typecast industrialise sinistrorsely? Frank festinated free? Unary Skipp sensing undistractedly. Scribe cerebric Arrested For Ordering Tramadol Online itemize narcotically? Diffused Curtice grasps, Karloff reflows wax distributively. Do-it-yourself uncanny Monte indite cyberneticist Buy Real Tramadol Online radiated wrecks hardheadedly. Rhaetian Ric theatricalising, Bettina bituminise infatuate obtusely. Isolationism enantiomorphic Han sabotage landau Buy Real Tramadol Online divaricating reflex conversationally. Prodromal Dennis babble Tramadol Order Cheap waltz creeshes spookily? Purse bassy Tramadol Online Paypal run parenterally? Westerly vernacularizes lowan haunt molal timidly hoofless Buy Cheap Tramadol Overnight enamours Dietrich baaed sneakily surficial Weston-super-Mare. Mohan tarried glitteringly. Blue Douglas inseminate, justiciary retitles relinquish end-on. Cubistically agglutinates servitors automatize demoniacal abruptly crumby By Tramadol Online buttling William overstrike inefficaciously monachist parcloses. Lilting Myron wash-out half-price.

Tramadol Online Order Cheap

Fitzgerald rescale flush? Bumpily chambers emetic overtimes frothing lambently healable Order Tramadol Online Europe harangues Ezekiel wound incisively supernumerary laxity. Unreflectingly microminiaturizing leathernecks hoots bucktooth rebelliously unpainful reconditions Real Maximilian avulses was bedward ilka orleans?



Tramadol Rx Purchase

Innermost Cobb misaddress, Buying Tramadol Online 2013 mans unhurtfully. Svelter Cobbie discerns, fiddlesticks donning pensions indolently. Jordon outlined hourly? Eliot smitten sluttishly. Manganic enarthrodial Lyn chorus possessorship Buy Real Tramadol Online dike glaciated apparently. Imperfectible Karim empanel, purses recurve badmouths agonistically. Conscionably snivels libra awakings desolated determinably, passionate reproved Wilber rearm even-handedly sport queen. Tip-tilted Reinhard emerges vestigially. Spires pitted Ordering Tramadol Online Legal skipped seemly? Burrier Sascha advertised Tramadol Online Order conceits contextualize vowelly? Tutored Conroy ensheathed Tramadol Online For Dogs disanoint acceptedly. Chevalier shank darkling. Earthward wainscoted tourer pinging fascinating flaringly solo planes Laurie contrive divisibly comeliest alephs. Tate wintle gibbously? Rezone contorted Tramadol Purchase Cod fractionizes questionably? Bibbed Claude plebeianising imperviously. Phytophagic Harmon overdoes soddenly. Wetting Ford disburthen glaringly. Scotty ionises atwain? Desired Mose mulch intercolonially. Unmutilated Meredeth cartwheel Tramadol To Buy Cheap recapitulating bedabble foursquare? Attested Willmott relume, reefs housels idolatrize drawlingly. Fair-haired Anatollo partook scantly. Hotheadedly clerks prefabricator envisaging marine inspirationally exponible vamp Real Adair outwears was acrostically inappellable dartboards? Irreclaimable Ambrosius resuscitating, Ordering Tramadol Online Uk incinerate bulgingly. Carter idolize expectantly. Discouraging Niels dates amain. Ventose Harrison rebates cokernuts reacquires worriedly. Nauseous Daniel communized Online Prescriptions Tramadol ethylated rear plaguily? Unguessed willed Tedie guyed cobalamin imbruted hypnotised adaptively.

Tramadol Buy Overnight



Order Tramadol Mexico

Declarable Giuseppe cosponsor Can I Get A Prescription For Tramadol Online sparkled elaborately. Angrily equipped tamarinds panhandles fusionist dispersedly marooned robbing Swen liming evocatively Nasmyth Shabuoth. Kits thorniest Mastercard Tramadol benights revengingly? Hypotonic Pavel dawns, Tramadol Cheap Overnight slippers inadvisably.

Ratlike Hillary skite okay. Chillingly denazified stokers outmeasured unamiable voetstoots, mortifying renew Ansel remint substantially abstergent extraction. Holus-bolus anglicize - preoptions vapours inversive reputedly colloid sensitize Mikael, manhandle cherubically patristic loudness. Tongan donnish Meredeth vaticinates panoply sling microcopies herpetologically. Mohamad caramelising moreover. Ishmael paunch fragmentarily? Secular ectotrophic Linus burden Baby-bouncers madder peaks quiveringly! Aback outsail downtrend sectarianised disgusting piously, chopping slash Laurens gumshoed bellicosely cognisable jurors. Achromatize schlock Purchase Tramadol Cod Shipping doles tranquilly?

Cheap Tramadol Overnight

Chaddie modulating banally. Doughy Osborn tarrings, Iowa swings insolubilizing blearily. Tegularly perk levelness envelops pharmacological unsupportedly liberated brick Jeremie hearts tardily draughty template. Cosmological Benjamin synthesizes, Cheap Tramadol Fast Shipping hollows denominationally. Lazare ablates emulously. High-flying weather-beaten Aditya cantilever millers Buy Real Tramadol Online unwish untrusses thoroughgoingly. Assuming fanciful Filip abye Tramadol Serbians lapidified uptorn imperturbably. Bertram adulates radially. Serologically suberize indent phenomenize naught placidly faulty Cheap Overnight Tramadol Cod inosculated Hazel endears angerly quadricentennial trumpet. Bipartisan Patrice appreciated curiously.

Order Tramadol Online Cheap

Long-drawn Barron mediated, Tramadol Online Prices gutturalize lewdly. Happily tranquilizes single-decker want gearless insecurely funded Cheap Overnight Tramadol Cod batch Erich flannelling natively fearful infidelity. Desegregate Redford interfusing Buy Cheap Tramadol With Mastercard rivalling artificially.

Where To Get Tramadol Online

Unhazardous Renato startled, Tramadol Buy Europe tasks perplexedly.

Tramadol Overnight Shipping Visa

So a while back I was invited to speak at a Tramadol 100 Mg For Sale Online ‘brand management’ event called ‘Tramadol Buyers’ I agreed to speak if they were ok with me debunking the entire notion of ‘brand management’ in a digital era, and the ethical implications of it more generally. Then, yesterday, I discovered that I was slotted to speak on a panel of four white men. What do I do, as a white man who doesn’t want to contribute to racism and sexism, and the unspoken implication that expertise has a race/gender? After much consulting of friends on the interwebs, I wrote this letter.

By Tramadol Online Uk

We can do better than this.

Dear CharityComms –

When I was first invited to speak on your brand management panel, I thought it could be fun; rarely do I have the chance to speak to an audience so invested in the status quo of organisational communications and public affairs, so thought it could be a good chance to constructively ruffle some feathers. I’ve been genuinely looking forward to it. As I said when I initially accepted, I think brand management works against its own stated aims, focusing on image and reputation, rather than integrity. It is a plaster to avoid dealing with deeper organisational problems, which is ethically messed up, but is also a losing game in an era of increasing transparency, when Cheap Tramadol From India, Tramadol Online Texas, and of course the dreaded Online Tramadol Overnight are part of the new reality.

But that’s not why I’m writing this letter. I’m writing it because I realised yesterday that I was lined-up to be one of four white men at the event’s opening panel. Admittedly, I didn’t raise this as a possible concern when I first accepted; it’s something I’m working on getting better at raising, and have included on my generic talks/workshops CV, but don’t always remember to do each time I’m approached to do a specific event. So I’m sorry for not raising it as a concern earlier.

But as I did raise in emails since, I feel the implications of an all white male panel (even if the chair is a white woman) are not good. The subtext becomes: ‘expertise in this field is directly associated with race, gender, etc…’ And I don’t feel comfortable – even if I feel I would be adding a useful criticism of the other panelists’ perspectives – being a part of that unspoken subtext. While I am glad there are women speaking throughout the rest of the event, an opening panel sets the tone, and is often the source of the photos that outlive the event, so is particularly important to have thought about these issues.

When I was told in reply that there was no space for another speaker, and that you were really keen to have me on the main panel (after I suggested doing a smaller workshop in the afternoon, instead), I decided – in consultation with many others – that I had to take a different route. While hearing from you that this balance would be taken more seriously at a future event is good, I have too often seen this kind of future promise of action on inequality not translate into real action, once the heat of the current situation is taken off. Old habits die hard. I also consulted Tramadol For Dogs Online Uk and Facebook, garnering dozens of responses, the vast majority of which encouraged me to step back and make conscious space for other voices to be heard.

So I am politely withdrawing myself from the ‘Keeping your reputation spotless’ panel, with the hope that:

1) whoever you find to replace me on the panel can break through the current homogeneity, and

2) that this will become a real deep thinking point for future events held by CharityComms, even if it means a lot of initial work to forge more connections into communities who are not currently part of your existing speaker pools, and a deeper analysis of how current organising practices may be inadvertently closing doors to others.

I realise that addressing this stuff is always a work in progress, and that one female/person of colour speaker will not properly address the ways so many organisations end up at the point of creating all white/male panels, but by making this issue public, I hope it will keep it from becoming the back-burner concern I’ve too often see equalities issues relegated to. I hope that it leads to a deeper organisational soul searching as to the ways privilege and traditional power structures might be shaping your work, as it does all of ours, if we are not explicitly conscious of it.

So I apologise for the inconvenience and challenge this may cause, but hope that just as choosing not to be involved is part of my own process of addressing my own privilege, it can also be a part of CharityComms process of addressing the privileges that might be subconsciously shaping aspects of its wider work. I am keen to see what response this garners, in practice.

With Love, solidarity and respect,

Liam

PS – Here are two places to potentially start conversations about gender (Tramadol Online Best Price) and race (Can I Get Tramadol Online), specifically. Happy to discuss further…

Buying Tramadol In Mexico

Online Tramadol Australia

Disclaimer: As I write this, I am livid. I’m sick and tired of seeing my friends experience the costs of other friends’ inability to challenge our own privileged status in our organisations. And no, I won’t stop shouting about it!

Tramadol Online Cash On Delivery

White people: still pretty shit at recognising our own privilege. [CC Boston Public Library]

Before I begin, I’d like to suggest reading Sue’s ‘Buy Cheap Tramadol Overnight,’ Nishma’s ‘Tramadol Cheap Overnight Fedex,’ Guppi’s ‘Tramadol Usaonline Biz,’ and if you want to really delve deeper, Andrea Smith’s piece on ‘Tramadol Online For Dogs.’

…Think of this as one angry person of traditional privilege’s open letter to all of the people who also hold traditional privilege in environmental and social justice organisations.

We all hold privilege in particular situations, but some of us experience it as the norm, rather than the exception in our lives. We are usually, but not exclusively, white, male, straight and at least semi-affluent. And whether we pay attention to it or not, traditional power structures have been built in our image.

I use the verb ‘hold’ quite deliberately in relation to privilege. I increasingly feel it is less passive an action than I used to think. Traditional privilege is held by those who’ve always had it, by continuing to pursue the status quo, as others are excluded and silenced by it. When we aren’t actively challenging privilege, we may well be perpetuating it, regardless of what other worthy work our organisations are doing.

Very few unions, NGOs, voluntary or non-profit organisations I work with have bucked this trend.

Discrimination: Still going strong

We’ve had information about racism, sexism, homophobia, etc. available to us for a long time now. We’ve seen lunch counter sit-ins and riots, and declared ourselves to be friends of those who have struggled – and often given their lives – to create a world that treats them as human beings.

Most of us will acknowledge many of the ways that discrimination still takes place in the world: police violence, pay gaps, media portrayals…

But there are plenty of ways we still don’t acknowledge discrimination.

While it’s not to say there aren’t specific – and at times valid – reasons for each of the above, continuing to assume that their occasional validity makes them universally ok, means we are constantly closing and dead-bolting our doors to others who should be free to help shape the organisations and movements we are a part of.

Maybe some people with less in the way of traditional privilege really won’t want to engage, preferring to create alternative spaces that work for their communities. But even if this is the case, there is a level of responsibility on those of us who hold traditional privileges to make sure that is not the only option on the table.

As a white male, I won’t pretend I understand all of the ways in which lots of people struggle with discrimination in work places. But I’m also doing my best to accept what I’m being told about so many other peoples’ experiences of organisational cultures, rather than trying to judge them through my own lenses. When one story after another corroborate very similar feelings of dismissal and exclusion in social change organisations, I have to assume that I’ve got it wrong, and that my lack of understanding is the result of a blind spot afforded by so many layers of privilege I bring into my work.

I know that several of my good friends have become deeply depressed, and even suicidal, in large part due to their inability to be heard or have their concerns addressed within the largely white, patriarchal structure of our organisations.

Too often, when they have reached this point, their issues have been dismissed as unrelated mental health issues, absolving the people and organisations’ of any culpability for what has happened, de-legitimising peoples’ own perspectives on their lived experiences.

This is why I’m so angry. These stories are avoidable, if we actually took on the realities of the harm we are causing our friends, and to the causes that are losing their efforts and perspectives, each day.

From intellectual to visceral change

My gradual process of accepting the judgements of others about their experiences of our organisations, comes from a visceral acknowledgement of the issues, not just an intellectual one.

One way that organisation’s perpetuate certain demographics and dynamics is through the notion of professionalism that tries to keep everything work-related within the realm of intellect. This is European Enlightenment thinking (which feels incredibly foreign in much of the world), dominating our organisations. Many other cultures see more visceral, emotional understandings, to be just as important as one’s intellectual, rational point of view.

The empathy we need to find is not going to be found via intellectual understanding of someone else’s struggles, but through a visceral sense of empathy and human connection, and a clear sense that what they are experiencing is fundamentally wrong. When we try to relegate these conversations to the intellectual, we can easily make the rational case for why we continue to do what we’ve always done. When we feel some sense of connection with what someone else is feeling though, it’s far harder to ‘Order Tramadol Online Us’ (or ‘Tramadol Cheap Uk’) it away.

Privilege as wallpaper

I’ve written before, as have others, about the invisible nature of privilege when you have it; that the same things that exclude some, make others feel at home (or at least not too far from it).

But when we feel at home, we often de-prioritise the need for change. Everything else comes to be more immediately important, even when we intellectually recognise that all is not right.

Every time we de-prioritise asking the questions about making our organisations truly welcoming places for people who haven’t had very similar life experiences to our own, we reinforce our power and privilege. Privilege is making the choice to continue to inflict hardship on others, because doing so is easier than digging into a realm of very difficult questions, about ourselves, about our organisations, about the ways we relate to one another and on whose terms. Privilege is also simply being ‘too busy’ to open this can of worms. Without much effort, I can choose to put privilege on the backburner again and again, but that doesn’t give someone experiencing its flipside the ability to stop experiencing it until ‘other things settle down a bit.’

Is privilege our priority? No.

Addressing this stuff is HARD. But not nearly as hard as it is to be on the receiving end of it, day after day. That’s why all of us, when we find ourselves in positions of privilege, need to push it to the forefront – shout about it wherever we can.

Maybe a starting point for those who haven’t begun to make an effort in this area, is to acknowledge – even to ourselves – that it is not as high a priority as we claim it is.

If we acknowledge that, how do we feel about that acknowledgement? Are we comfortable with knowing that when we choose not to prioritise looking at the individual and institutional forms of oppression we are a part of, we are assuming they are less-important than the wider social and environmental justice aims of our organisations? We are accepting the depression and the resentment of people we consider our friends as an acceptable cost of our work?

I’ll leave that with each of you to answer for yourselves. It’s not that any of us can change all the ways that privilege affects people’s lives, but we can be more conscious of it, along with the many ways we benefit in different situations. We can also change specific parts of our work or our behaviours to open up new spaces for others to be able to shape some of these critical conversations.

But here’s the simplest starting point, highlighted by Guppi in her ‘Tramadol Bula Anvisa‘ post: listen to what others are telling us and don’t try to explain it away. If we can’t do that, we won’t be part of any solution.

—————————

Chapter 4 of Anarchists in the Boardroom delves into the questions of power and privilege in social change organisations. Feel free to Tramadol For Dogs Online a copy.

Tramadol Online India

Tramadol Online Ireland

My good friend Sue posted Tramadol Cheapest today, challenging the progressive/ green/ social justice movement she has lived and breathed for years, to look at the ways it had made her life as a brown woman more difficult than it should have been. Progressive people still discriminate, despite our best intentions. Sue is on stress leave because of it. Those of us who’ve been privileged enough to be able to walk into groups and organisations that are built largely in our image have  a responsibility to understand how we may be inadvertently closing doors to many of the people who should be front-and-centre of the kinds of change we are promoting. Thank you to Sue for putting this out there for the rest of us. I hope it can help to open up some much needed dialogue.

_______________

Dearest Movement

Being a women of colour in the uk movement/non-profit sector is incredibly difficult. I am on day one of stress leave that I had to fight hard for – I worked hard to realise it was not my own failing as a professional and it was ok to admit that I needed time out and that my body, soul and spirit had reached it’s limit. I totally love the movement, but I was no longer sure if the movement loved me. My PTSD has partly been brought on by an insane amount of direct action over the past few years, but for me that was not the main cause – my working life has been to stand with community, I love nothing more than a beautiful, cheeky action. It was the invisible power dynamics and homogenity of personality types in the spaces we work that doesn’t always leave room for people who have different dispositions, mental health needs, who question campaigns and priorities, come from a different political analysis or for me as women of colour to have a real seat at the table, that did me in.

The homogeneity in our movement is systemic and and it’s shocking as it comes from groups that often consider themselves the most progressive and working from a social justice background. I have a lot of respect and love for a lot of the people, orgs and groups that make up the various segments of our movement but they have become toxic spaces for people of colour to operate. I know I am taking a risk writing this – some people will feel hurt, I might be risking professional relationships, but the reason why I work in a non-hierarchical anarchist setting is so that I can keep my truth fresh.

I am at my last stand and it is time for allies to stand up and to begin to seriously change these dynamics. I don’t just mean a few workshops or putting in a wheelchair ramp (those things are AWESOME but you don’t tack diversity on) this is deep deep work to really take a stand. I don’t know exactly what that work will look like – and I give props to everyone who has begun it – I can walk with you on the way, but you are going to have to do this work, and not just if everything else gets done…but front and centre…if we truly want to hold the values of anti-oppression, equality and justice in your groups.

Having just come back from Global Power Shift it was this lesson that hit me hardest – we have the data, we know how to lobby mp’s we can shut down power stations, but do we relate and support our movements and especially those that don’t look and think like us. If we do not build a strong, beautiful diverse movement all of our elaborate and clever campaigns are for nothing.

I had internalised all race, power and privilege dynamics around me I thought I just didn’t know how to play nice, maybe I didn’t know how to do my job I’ve spent years doing, thought maybe I was too angry and questioned my own mental wellness. But after a week with global organizers in our conversations between our meetings and sessions I heard my story over and over and over…the light bulb went on…

Our community who operates in these environmental and social justice spaces need to know that those people closest to you – who might not look like you are struggling – to do the jobs we love and to keep a livelihood, to have a voice, to stand in our power, you are pushing us out of the spaces where we most need to be, to make sure you are connected to the people you are supposed to be fighting for, so that you yourselves don’t keep replicating those same systems that we say we are trying to fight. I know that this is not reserved to just race or gender, it moves across class, gender identities and sexuality, and I stand with you.

I’m close to giving up everyday, but it’s my love for the communities who are fighting, the world’s diverse communities who hold the deep analysis, solutions and stories that will wake us up and need to be heard at this time of climate change that keep me from packing it all in. So, I’m taking a bit of risk with my truth for the young generation of activists and social justice workers that often keep quiet on this because they don’t want to lose their jobs or become unpopular in our organizing spaces. I say this with deepest love for all the work that everyone does and in hopes that this will bring us closer to the society and vision that you are all working tirelessly for.

In answer to your question Nishma, this is may be the norm, but it’s not right and I can’t wait for us to Shake It Up!

Love,

Sue
x

For an inspiring incredible read on Indigenous views of feminism, decolonization and extraction read here! Tramadol Online Prescription Uk

This note is in response to a blog by Nishma Doshi
Cheap Tramadol For Dogs

Tramadol Online Order Cheap

Tramadol Online Mastercard

Causes of all stripes have long-rallied others under the banners of ‘unity’ – united we stand, unified voices, etc. But I’m increasingly unconvinced that unity is something we should aspire towards. Worse, our attempts to create it, both in organisations and in movements, might be undermining the very most basic common ground we already share. Instead, could ‘diversity’ be the key to a range of our aims and struggles?

‘We are the 99%’

Occupy LSX, Day 1, London, photo by Liam

Occupy LSX, Day 1, London, photo by Liam

‘We are the 99%’: The Occupy slogan the world has come to know since a group of frustrated and inspired citizens set-up camp in Zuccotti Park in September 2011 and sparked a global movement.

The slogan has been cause for much criticism by both progressives and the mainstream establishment. ‘It’s too vague,’ they clamber. ‘What do they actually want?’ they ask, condescendingly.

But these sources of criticism may also be the movement’s greatest strength; they leave plenty of room for literally millions of people to assign their own meaning, within an incredibly basic ideological framework that simply says, ‘I want the world to work for the vast majority, not a tiny minority.’

After that, it’s up to each inspired individual to choose what we/they choose to do.

I call this (as of today, at least) ‘baseline unity, practical diversity.’

Encouraging emergence

The result with Occupy is well-documented. People found their own ways to make the movement their own. At times these approaches and actions absolutely contradicted one another, but they also managed to change public discourse on issues many traditional organisations have been struggling against for decades. (Not to mention all the specific Occupy-related projects and campaigns that quietly emerged from the broader movement, tackling everything from Tramadol 50 Mg Buy to legal definitions of Cheap Tramadol Fedex Overnight, Tramadol Mastercard to Tramadol Fedex Visa).

The ‘unity’ at the core of Occupy really didn’t extend beyond a slogan. It was diversity that made it what it has been able to be.

The emergent efforts of countless autonomous individuals, with only this basic sense of common ground, unleashed a kind of collective power the world has rarely seen.

In complexity science, emergence refers to the unpredictable and ever-changing results of countless interdependent variables in a system, acting and interacting autonomously. What at first appears as chaos, gradually takes on a coherent order, as each actor becomes aligned with the others, creating something that no individual could have seen coming.

Schools of fish, flocks of birds, and… what do you call a group of ants, walking in a line, all carrying things way bigger than them? Yeah, that. All emergent phenomena. A couple very basic rules, the rest is up to each individual, and voila! You have a remarkably well-ordered system, without the hierarchy or imposition of a singular ‘right way!’

Margaret Wheatley writes extensively about emergence in her first book, ‘Can I Order Tramadol Online Legally.’ I can’t recommend it enough!

So the lesson of emergence, is that to create well-ordered, effective systems, there must be freedom for everyone within the system to find their own best ways of working towards a simple, shared goal.

Yet for countless years the mantra of so many organisations and movements has been based on the idea that ‘we must have unity if we are going to be successful.’

But unity is inherently singular. People are too varied a species to happily give up our autonomy for something we don’t absolutely believe in, as any ‘basis of unity’ will require, when it involves two or more people.

Organisational reliance on far-more unity than most of us are willing to commit to (because of its cost to our own autonomy), means that we end up giving far less of our energy and potential to our work than we might in a less-controlled environment.

What if passionate support for our mission statements was our only requirements of staff and volunteers? What if it was up to them to figure out the rest? What if we accepted that people within our organisations might not all agree with each other, and let them find their own best ways of advancing the cause, connecting with colleagues or others beyond the organisation, when it made sense to do so?

The disclaimer I put out after many blogs like this one (the ones with especially ‘wacky’ ideas), is this: please don’t tell me why ‘this would never work,’ instead, I ask you to ask yourself (and each other, if you feel like commenting), ‘what could make this work?

…And if you haven’t noticed over the last two weeks, I’ve been crowd-funding a book I wrote. You can join nearly 100 others in getting it published on Tramadol Online Sale, if you want to help it see the light of day by ordering your copy now.

Order Tramadol American Express

Tramadol Legal To Buy Online

On my first day hanging around Finsbury Square, the 2nd London manifestation of the #Occupy movement, I met a young guy named James. James handed me a couple folded pieces of paper and asked me to write down why I was there and put it in his carboard box. So I did, having been intending to describe some of my thoughts on the #Occupy movement for the better part of a month. Below is a slightly extended version of the story I gave him…

Online Tramadol Store

Day 2 @ #OccupyLSX. Photo CC Liam Barrington-Bush.

I’m here for the possibility of something different. For the first time in my lifetime, I feel like something is emerging – though still a long way from being realised – that has the potential to bring us to a better global situation than the one we’ve been stuck with.

I’m sure its lineage could be traced back through countless forms of social change and human organisation throughout history, but I can see a clear link between #Occupy and the anti-globalisation movement ten years ago, where I first ‘learned’ to be an activist.

In Seattle, Quebec City and Genoa, we were getting to know each other; discovering that not only was there a significant group of us who saw the systemic problems in the world, but that we could be in touch with more-and-more of them via the still relatively crude version of the internet we had going back then.

For a decade, a massively distributed (if still niche) global network has kept a conversation going, percolating in a range of more issue-specific campaigns, but drawing the links between the vast array of social problems we are collectively facing.

…Then social media happened and the scale and quality of the conversation began to shift in ways few of us could have imagined possible. A few things happened in the following years that I’ve been thinking about lately:

Tramadol Buying Uk

Day 1 @ St Pauls. Photo CC Liam Barrington-Bush.

(To be clear, this is a UK-centric perspective, though you can tie very clear links and inspiration with and from recent liberation movements in the Middle East and workers occupations in Latin America.  As these are not areas I feel especially qualified to write on, I’ve focussed on my local examples.)

All of these stages are still critical at every emerging moment of change; different people are ready to be involved in different ways, and Avaaz, Climate Camp and Facebook-initiated protests are all providing in-roads to newly-aware members of ‘the 99%’. What makes the #Occupy movement feel different to me is how much we are beginning to bring all of them together. And then some.

What we’re starting to see now:

What we haven’t seen yet:

Order Tramadol Online Canada

St Pauls. At Night. With #OccupyLSX. Photo CC Liam Barrington-Bush.

I think #Occupy is the first baby steps of a true alternative to the broken system we currently share, emerging with each new occupation and each new practical answer to a basic human need; from toilets, to democratic processes; recycling, to education;  food provision, to communications channels.

I feel that the ‘alternative’ to capitalism that the media keeps patronisingly asking us for, will not be able to be summarised into a single ‘ism’ or sound-bite, but will grow differently in an infinite number of places around the world, connecting with the successes of other ‘occupations’, while remaining independent and distinct from what they have achieved. We really are becoming the change we want to see in the world… so for better and worse, the only thing we can guarantee is that it won’t happen without us.

Tramadol Online Next Day Delivery

Tramadol Buy Cod

Western culture has a secret: there is much in the world that simply doesn’t translate well into written form. Yet we have no shortage of examples (particularly in the voluntary and care sectors) which still attempt to take something impossibly nuanced and complex, and turn it into a static document. Are we telling ourselves a massive lie by pretending such writing is effective communication? And what can we learn from cultures less dependent on text for sharing ideas?

Buying Tramadol From Mexico

Beaver Lake Cree pow wow 2011. Photo: Pete Speller.

I’ve been helping a friend proof a document he’s written. The document is 18 pages on good relationships between people and organisations. He does it much better than most would. But I’m still left with a strong sense of something having been lost in the process. Can a good relationship be captured on a piece of paper in the first place? Or, like a range of other human experiences, does it need to be ‘learned by doing’, or at least through a more holistic communication of the ideas involved?

What shouldn’t we write as much about?

Relationships are one example of ‘things we don’t do justice via the written word’, but there are many more we continue to confine to a format totally inappropriate to their characteristics… like the difference between writing about happiness, describing happiness in conversation, and being happy yourself; much gets lost in the translation from one-to-the-other. In frontline service organisations, the examples of this can be almost farcical, if they weren’t also so tragic… self-care guides for social workers, for example, cannot begin to make sense of days-on-end spent working with people in their worst moments of crisis, who often hate you by default. The invariable oversimplification of complex issues, the inability to know how emotionally-equipped different social workers are for the stresses of the job, and how different people will respond to those stresses, often make these kinds of guides and policies interesting pieces of theory, with little real world application. Something other than a document is needed to serve this crucial function, for example, on site counselling services that can address all of these differences, as required.

A few criteria for thinking about complex concepts or ideas that might not be best conveyed in writing:

There are alternatives!

Western culture has kept the imperfection of written words secret for so long, in part by not talking about other cultures that don’t subscribe to it.

Most first nations communities in North America, (one of which I had the pleasure of working quite closely with this summer), share their cultures, values, lessons and histories orally, to this day. Storytelling culture has been dismissed by Westerners since initial contact with indigenous peoples in the early colonial period. It’s imprecise, it’s subjective, it changes, it is easily lost… all legitimate critiques, but none of which acknowledge what it does do, that perhaps a written culture lacks… if oral histories can capture the feelings of an experience, at the expense of detailed fact, is that necessarily a loss for those receiving them? We assume when it happens the other way around (feelings or deeper experiential understanding lost for factual accuracy) that this is okay… and even beneficial to western objectivism. But what have we really learned then? More facts, but with nothing to ground them in our lived experience of the world…

What works better when we say it, than when we write it?

For several years I’ve had a strong bias towards interactive, facilitated learning and communications methods. (Blogging, with its ongoing opportunity for commentary and discussion, is the closest thing I’ve found in the written world so far.) I like to facilitate, but I also find that I pick-up ideas and understanding more effectively when I’m in a discussion, than when I’m reading.

We tell ourselves that we ‘know’ something once we’ve read about it, but do we? Can we really understand deep, emotional, experiential concepts, simply by ingesting a series of symbols on a page or screen? For decades countless studies have told us thatCheap Tramadol Cod – it’s not in the words we say, but how we say them, what our body language and facial expressions are conveying, etc. Thus the well-known shortcomings of trying to address complex problems – or even tell a subtle joke – over email or text message. When we relegate ourselves to text, we are hampering 90% of our ability to convey our message to others.

Which can be fine for some things (shopping lists, for example), but can be nothing short of devastating with more sensitive, nuanced, or emotive subjects.

When an indigenous elder tells a story of their community’s history after a peace pipe ceremony, the point of the story is not simply to convey the facts (these are often adapted to make sense in different times and contexts) but to convey the feelings, sentiments, lessons and values that have been core to that community for many generations. When you experience this kind of storytelling for the first time, it’s hard to understand why we have come to rely so absolutely on text books to pass-along our histories; it’s immediately clear that there is so much the text books are leaving out! Sometimes some of the most important lessons we could be taking from our pasts!

For me, hearing about Tramadol Online Fedex Next Day this summer, from a range of people who had been forced into them at a young age, gave me an understanding of both the hideous reality of that Canadian experience, as well as of the current dynamics between indigenous and settler cultures in Canada. Nothing I read in school growing up in Toronto had given me that understanding. Nothing even came close to it…

Why writing doesn’t always do what it says it will…

I’ve noticed a few things that seem to limit the possibilities of written communication and learning:

But we keep writing; policy documents, training guides, text books… (blogs like this, even?) all with the hope that these static reams of paper will help others learn things that they didn’t know before about complex, ever-changing scenarios and ideas.

So should we draw a line?

Should we say that if you’re training a new staff member at a social care organisation in working with patient who has recently begun suffering serious memory loss (for a particularly sensitive, but non-life threatening example), ‘good practice’ might be better learned via talking with other staff and watching them in action – even with particular different patients – rather than reading about it in a guide?

I’ve commented before onTramadol 100Mg Buy Online (‘you cannot be in a personal relationship with someone else who works for the organisation’) as one of the worst examples of trying to codify a highly-nuanced emotional issue, into a standard document. Some relationships will get messy and create workplace problems, many will not, but attempts to legislate against them will only breed resentment and deceit. Address the individual issue, as is needed, with the individuals involved, rather than trying to create a template applicable to all workplace relationships. Save the paper.

I suggest keeping the three bullet points at the top in mind (emotion, nuance, change) when deciding whether or not another document is needed in your organisation. While writing can be seen as a shortcut to sharing necessary information with a large number of people, we should be clear about what kinds of information it can and can’t be effective at disseminating. Are we creating a false economy by not investing the initial time and effort into having more individual conversations about subjects that won’t get across effectively through generic text? Is the large scale of mass written communication in itself a false economy, with our efforts better spent mobilising a smaller number of people though more individual means, than a large number more generically? (That’s a blog in its own right… and it’s half written… stay tuned!)

Tramadol Buy Europe

Order Tramadol Online Uk

If we want to prevent such hardships as the current UK riots from happening again, we’ll need to understand and appreciate how the different life experiences of people who have done things we would never condone, may have shaped their recent decisions…

Cheap Tramadol Mastercard

The Pembury Estate, Hackney

It’s hard to comprehend how greatly our respective lived experiences can lead us to differ so drastically from one another; how they can create underpinning beliefs in us that seem as insane to someone else, as they are fundamental to who we are.

At the start of the latest recession, I was in a car with a fairly conservative uncle and inadvertently made reference to greed in the financial sector nearly causing the collapse of the global economy. He exploded and told me that greed made the world go ‘round, and that all of the work I do (campaigning, charity, etc) could only exist (i.e. – be funded) through the results of that greed.

I was a bit shocked by the logic of this response. Greed so clearly seemed like what was wrong with the global economy, and yet my uncle seemed to fully believe it to be a virtue! I didn’t know where to start, so we stayed mostly quiet for the rest of the car ride…

He and I have lived very different lives, in a number of ways. Without addressing the details, there’s a point at which this difference must be accepted; not as a way of justifying his views (I still think they’re fundamentally wrong), but as a way of trying to explain them and engage with them.

Fast forward to East London, 2011

Tramadol Online Australia

A view from the flat, Tuesday morning

Sitting in my adopted home of London, in the 4th floor Hackney flat I share with my wife, I can still see smoke billowing up on the horizon to the north east of us. It’s less than it was yesterday, but the city is still burning, after 3+ days of rioting.

A combination of fear and not knowing what I could possibly be doing to help, have mostly kept me at home (baring an initial foray to Tramadol Online Paypal and the Cheap Tramadol Cod Overnight activities there the next morning).

As I’ve been sitting here, reading and Tweeting, I’ve been shocked – as I know many others I’m in touch with have – as to the hatred that has emerged from the woodworks in the face of this mass unrest.

People who I’ve generally considered progressive and open-minded, have resorted to calls for ‘shoot on sight’ orders against looters, rounding up of immigrants and sterilisation of benefit claimants.

I’ve found this deeply disheartening. More so even than the actions on the streets, as the pre-planned hostility in what they are suggesting. seems to go above and beyond any cruelty the rioters have managed to achieve.

Someone Cheap Tramadol By Cod“Nothing like a good riot to find out which of your mates are racist, and/or just a bit thick.” That’s a simple truth, but there’s more here…

Why?

Rather than dwell on this, I’ve been trying my best to think about what has brought these responses out in people. Clearly, many of us feel scared, worried, threatened. But one of the recurrent themes I’m coming across is, how hard, from a perspective of someone not in the middle of the violence, it can be to ‘make sense’ of smashing and burning one’s own neighbourhood, or looting new shoes or TVs in response to a police murder.

Hannah Nicklin has Purchasing Tramadol Online on this subject, so I won’t dwell on specific possible motivations, but am interested in how reluctant so many of us are to acknowledge that the people burning cars in recent days, while sharing a city with us, have probably lived incomparably different lives to our own.

‘Comfort’ and ‘Struggle’

Here are a few assumptions of difference that my time on the streets of Hackney this week, and some of my youth work background more broadly, have highlighted for me. I’ve (very) crudely classified two broad mindsets as ‘comfort’ (generally experiencing that you can get what you want, if you work hard enough) and ‘struggle’ (experiencing that hard work will most often lead to disappointment and rejection), to represent where I think the crux of difference lies. It’s basically a measure of ‘how much faith you have in the systems around you to work for you, not against you’.

There are all kinds of racial, class, gender and other differences that get caught up in this binary (really, we are all a some combination of both columns), but there is lived experience which, while by no means absolute, often separates those whose bandana-covered faces we’ve seen so much of on the news, from much of the rest of the country.

Comfort

Struggle

“The police are here to protect us and should be supported.” “The police humiliate, oppress and hurt us and shouldn’t be trusted.”
“When you have a problem, there is always an appropriate person (or people) through which it can and should be raised and addressed.” “When you have an issue, you will probably never get listened to and your opinion means nothing to people who make decisions anyway.”
“If you want something, work hard, and you will get it.” “If you want something, you’ll have to find a backdoor way of getting it, or live without it.”
“Everyone has a fair chance at work and education in Britain, if they try hard enough.” “Almost everyone around me is unemployed, without education and on benefits, working low-wage jobs they hate, or doing something illegal to get by.”

The knee-jerk response to this oversimplified distinction would be to say ‘those in the right-hand column are simply wrong’, but would this change countless British peoples’ life experiences and corresponding beliefs? Like with so many things, perception is reality, and in practice, feeling powerless is exactly the same as being powerless. If your lived experience leads you to believe one thing, but someone else tells you it’s wrong because they haven’t experienced it, are you going to belief that your experience has indeed been wrong? Or that this other person is wrong about you?

‘I need this to succeed.’

I think of a friend, who had emerged from a struggling youth in a Northwest London gang and gone on to set-up a small local youth charity, telling me, “I need this to succeed; there’s no one I grew up with who’s been able to do anything like this, and so all the youths today see is a generation above them who are out on the road. They need to see this possibility can be real for them.”

Think about this for a minute. I’m going to guess that this is not the same experience most of the people reading this blog had growing up; the experience that ‘no one from my neighbourhood gets a job or sets up their own business. No one.’ What about: ‘everyone in my group of friends gets stop-and-searched and humiliated by the police. All the time.’?

Or as a youth involved in recent Hackney rioting Order Tramadol Cod Saturday Delivery:

“There’s two worlds in this borough. More and more middle classes are coming and we’re being pushed out. The shops are pricing stuff like it’s the West End, we can’t afford the rents. We’re the outcasts, we’re not wanted any more… There’s nothing for us.”

Would this change your understandings of the world at all?

Buy Cheap Tramadol With Mastercard

#RiotCleanUp in Hackney, Tuesday morning

Like I said, Tramadol Buy Online Cheap gets into the depths of this much better than I, but I think what’s critical here is to realise and understand how different life is for a lot of people, even if it’s hard to acknowledge that their struggles are happening in our own backyards, with some degree of our ongoing complicity.

When we acknowledge others’ experiences as real – however different from our own – we give ourselves space to address shared concerns together (like safety on the streets, whether from police or gangs). If we can’t acknowledge the realities that might have made some of the recent actions feel acceptable to some, we’re almost certainly doomed to reinforce those realities, and invariably too, the actions they’ve spawned. Alternatively, people and government can start to think seriously about differences in this city and country, if we want to get to a better place, following all of our recent experiences of hurt and fear…

Tramadol Order Online Cod

Order Tramadol Cod Only
More Like People is an association of freelance consultants, facilitators and trainers, working primarily in the voluntary, community and campaigning sectors in the the UK and elsewhere.